What’s Your Customer Experience Value Quotient?
If value is defined as benefits versus costs, what’s your company’s customer experience value ratio? Superior value is the objective of customers and marketers alike. And since customers hold the purse strings, marketers are compelled to view value as customers do. In the customer experience value ratio, the numerator includes product and service value, as well as image and personal value. We may often overlook or be unaware of some of the cost dimensions in the denominator: money … plus time, energy and psychic costs.
In managing customer experience, the challenge is not only to maximize the numerator, but also to minimize the denominator. Touch-point analysis can be very helpful, but make sure non-touch-points are also considered, as the customer experience contains several elements that do not touch the company or channel. By carefully identifying and improving the time, energy and psychic costs to customers, the customer experience value quotient can be boosted significantly. In fact, the intangible elements of the denominator may be the hardest things for your competitors to copy, and therefore, your surest strategy to sustainable value superiority.
A great exercise in exploring your value quotient is to quantify the value ratio for all choices available to your customer. To develop a holistic perspective, plot these quotients as they existed in the past, as they currently exist, and as you project them to evolve in the future.
While the exercise above is illuminating, it’s incomplete in its prescriptive value to your organization. You may realize that your solution is inferior or superior to other alternatives available to your target customer, but which superior elements should you prioritize for protection and strengthening, and which inferior elements should you prioritize for improvement? The answer lies is customer experience outcome research, which involves ethnography to observe customers in their natural surroundings, revealing a more accurate and realistic viewpoint of the dimensions in the numerator and denominator of the customer’s value equation.
To innovate superior value, plot all available solutions by customers’ desired outcomes. If you have conducted customer outcome research, rank-order desired outcomes by importance x frustration x frequency. Now you’re able to see things the way the customer does: for the most important outcomes, how do the choices compare? Root cause analysis may identify engineering issues, service skill gaps, business process complications, or outdated policies.
Involve your whole organization in outside-in thinking and continual improvement by teaching them about the customer experience value quotient. For similar ideas, see my newest handbook, Innovating Superior Customer Experience.
Contact the author to find out how to customize these tips to your situation.
6 comments »
Linda Ireland
One more value ingredient
Lynn,
Thanks for a beefy and provocative post. Your ratio measurement is useful because it both illuminates the current condition and acknowledges the fact that experiences are rarely completely "good or bad".
I would add to a customer's view of value whether or not an experience solves a need that triggered them to act in the first place. In other words, I think every experience starts with a person who has a need or problem or desire they would trade something of value (typically money) to have solved. Whether or not - and how well - the need is solved is their ultimate measure of value.
Here's some additional thinking you might find interesting: http://bit.ly/Fhe6z Your thoughts?
Again, thanks for a helpful post.
Linda Ireland
Axel Schultze
Value Quotient versus Advocacy
Lynn, I have to admit that I may have not really understood the concept. I only have an MBA, a degree in electrical engineering, a controllers diploma and visited some marketing classes, but I'm not a scientist.
I'm a big proponent of measurable results. After all I determined that Advocacy should be the ultimate goal of a business and particularly today easy to measure.
Advocacy is achieved when a customer is publicly stating his or her positive impression about a company. It is a testimony for a positive customer experience. If a product is good but the customer doesn't talk - the customer experience was probably not very positive. If the customer experience is positive but the product bad, the customer is probably pretty silent as well. If both is bad you will hear it but in a not so favorable tone ;-)
Now if I compare the positive "output" from my customers with the one from my competitor I have a great benchmark. I can put that in relation to revenue, profitability and much more.
I can take it a level farther: I check a whole economy and recognize that companies like Dell, Virgin, WholeFoods, Salesforce.com, Apple, Zappos... seem to have happy and vocal customers, expressing their excitement. It's no coincidence that those companies are doing very well. In turn companies like United Airlines, Nortel, 3Com, Chase, GM, Comcast... have rather unfavorable customer statements - and voila those businesses are doing not well at all.
Now if one does a sentiment analysis - you get the root cause for frustration and excitement delivered free of charge - expressed by real customers. Fixing the problems in either customer care, technical support, order administration, the product itself is now a relatively simple business execution exercise.
Axel
xeesm.com/AxelS
Rick Harris
Assessing Customer Desired Outcomes
Lynn
I enjoyed your article, and the discussions that followed from others.
I also agree with many of your comments, esp. regarding the importance of including intangible value into the customer benefit assessment - I've done a lot of work in this area and have seen this at first-hand, time and time again.
One simple question from me: you mentioned assessing rank-order desired outcomes by importance x frustration x frequency . Are you suggesting multiplying out these 3 ranks, or is this just a confusion in notation ?
If you are multiplying these factors, this might be taking qual-derived preferences a bit too far, as your sample frame would be very small to base a Desired Outcome score on.
Hopefully, you can clarify this for me ?
Thanks
Rick
Owner - Customer Faithful
www.customerfaithful.com
http://customerfaithful.tumblr.com/




6 comments | 4522 reads 


