How Guthrie, OK, is bringing The Social Ecosystem to life
I recently had the pleasure of chatting with Matt Mueller, City Manager for the Town of Guthrie, Oklahoma. Matt has been in the role for only six months but has brought major changes to the town in terms of his approach to government 2.0, or, more specifically, in terms of his approach to The Social Ecosystem.
Guthrie, OK, is not a large town. The town’s population is around 10,000 and is on the older side, but a recent influx of young professionals is putting the town in a position where the mix of ages is becoming more and more balanced. Generations Y -> Z are well represented.
Guthrie is not a town in love with new technologies and cool buzzwords. They are a small town that believes in sharing information, helping the local citizens, and keeping their cost low. In other words, your average town.
The town is using the CivicPlus Government Content Management System and appears to love it. This CMS system provides a lot of flexibility and a lot of functionality, functionality they are not yet fully leveraging. However, the web site is getting 19,000 hits a day, pretty good for a town web site.
A key push for the town is to make all public documents available on the web site. This effort is resulting in lowering operational costs (as citizens can avoid coming in and making requests for information) and helping to build the trust level in the town. I asked Matt if he considered a town-wide satisfaction survey and this is something that is in the budget for this year. Organizations of all types must understand how their customers perceive their efforts and local governments are no different.
Guthrie has a local access television station where town meetings and other local information is made available. They are working to post all the programming, in video format, and it clearly needed. 25 hours of video a month is being viewed. This is an increase over 6 months ago and is opening up the information to a wider viewing audience.
You’ll note, so far I haven’t said much about Twitter and Facebook… While they do have a presence in these channels it is not an area they have yet put much investment in. Why? This is not a major information stream for their citizens today, their is added costs to these channels, and there is more work to be accomplished in their core channels.. The civicPlus CMS tool allows them to easily publish content out to each of these channels but the planning for the best ways to publish this information to best serve the citizens will take time. Frankly, they are getting large payback from their web, video, and TV efforts and need to do more work there first.
Guthrie is getting it right. They are leveraging the concepts of The Social Ecosystem to maximize their efforts, providing strong value to their citizens. Keep up the great work Matt! You and your team are definitely on the right path.
John
6 comments »
Andrew Blake
I am missing something
Mr. Moore,
I am new to much of this, so I apologize if this comes out wrong. But, what about what you describe is either Social, or similar to your Social Ecosystem. You mentioned something about not Facebook, and not Twitter and a small town who put documents online like many many other towns, small towns, small cities and cities around the world. There is nothing about citizens talking and the government listening.
They have a website, ok, why does this build trust? A method for making data available does not build trust, people do. Since there has not been a survey done, how do you know trust has been built? In the first paragraph you say this town "has an approach to a Social Ecosystem" - I ask why is this anything more than a town who put information online? Did the person who you spoke to say the words "Social Ecosystem", as that would be really interesting?
Andrew
Andrew Blake
You did not answer the question
Mr. Moore,
Again, I am not sure what you are saying. Now you have added that regular updates are "pushed". Are you saying that the website is updated, or emails are sent? This has been done for 10 years in towns across the world, there is nothing new here.
The commenting on the video, interesting, please forward a link. You did not say that in the original post. Updating a website is valuable, I agree, but that is no more social than publishing in a newspaper, this is old. I have read a few of your posts, and the concepts are not new. "...to receive the value they need (in this case, information)" is a concept that is 100 years old.
Sorry, I am missing what is new, novel, or social in any way.
Andrew
Andrew Blake
How about starting the questions asked
Mr. Moore,
I do not know how else to to say it. How about starting with the sentences in the first two replies that end with "?". I am not questioning Mr. Mueller, I am questioning your embellishment of what he is doing. He seems to be doing good work, it is a website, some videos, it is outbound, with no collaboration as far as anyone can tell (I asked also for a link to say otherwise). You make the claim that it is his "approach to the Social Ecosystem" - are those your words, or his? If the Social Ecosystem is "a definition in progress" (your words) how can he/they be doing it?
You make claims about reduced costs, please share quantitative numbers?
You make claims about increased audience, please share quantitative numbers? Specifically, are there people who did not have access to information before, who now have access.
You make a statement about video viewing "25 hours a month" how did they reach the conclusion that online video is good, but Facebook and Twitter are not? Are the videos on YouTube or a private server?
The website is getting "19,000 hits per day", how many unique visitors, hits is a circa 2000 measure which has no meaning?
I am sorry, but you make lots of claims, it is a good story, with no teeth.
Andrew




6 comments | 1601 reads 


